1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2018
  4. DHSS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2018.dhss.010

Modelling and simulation of a fire department’s response to emergency incidents

  • a Adriano O. Solis  ,
  • b Jenaro Nosedal-Sánchez  ,
  • c Ali Asgary  , 
  • d Francesco Longo  , 
  • e Beatrice Zaccaro  
  • acSchool of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • bFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México Cerro de Coatepec, Ciudad Universitaria Toluca, México
  • bDIMEG, University of Calabria, Rende (CS), Italy
  • bDIME, University of Genoa, Genoa (GE), Italy
Cite as
Solis A.O., Nosedal-Sánchez J., Asgary A., Longo F., Zaccaro B. (2018). Modelling and simulation of a fire department’s response to emergency incidents. Proceedings of the 8th International Defence and Homeland Security Simulation Workshop (DHSS 2018), pp. 73-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.dhss.010
 Download PDF

Abstract

After statistical analysis of the database of a fire department covering eight years of consecutive incident records from January 2009 to December 2016, we developed a modelling and simulation (M&S) approach that could be replicated for fire departments across Canada. Our M&S framework involved two different simulation models running on separate platforms: (i) an Incident Generation Engine, which simulates the ‘arrival’ of emergency incidents, and (ii) a Response Simulation Model. The first model is a discrete event simulation model using CPNTools 4.0, generating inputs for the second model, which is an agent-based simulation model developed using AnyLogic. We discuss the principal elements of the two simulation models, and report on findings from our simulation experiments.

References

  1. Aleisa, E., and Savsar, M., 2013. Modeling of firefighting operations through discrete event simulation. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 5 (4), 678-682.
  2. Altay, N., and Green, W.G., 2006. OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal
    of Operational Research, 175 (1), 475-493.
  3. AnyLogic, 2017. AnyLogic Simulation Software Version 8.0.5. Accessed in October 2017 at
    http://www.anylogic.com.
  4. Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 2017. Fire Statistics in Canada, Selected Observations from the National Fire Information Database 2005 to 2014. Report prepared for the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs, September 2017.
  5. Carroll, J.M., 1982. Digital simulator for allocating firefighting resources. Simulation, 38 (1), 1-12.
  6. Ceyhan, E., Ertuğay, K., and Düzgün, S., 2013  Exploratory and inferential methods for spatiotemporal analysis of residential fire clustering in urban areas. Fire Safety Journal, 58 (complete), 226-239.
  7. Chu, G., and Wang, J., 2012. Study on probability distribution of fire scenarios in risk assessment to emergency evacuation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 99 (complete), 24-32.
  8. Clare, J., Garis, L., Plecas, D., and Jennings, C., 2012. Reduced frequency and severity of residential fires following delivery of fire prevention education by on-duty fire fighters: Cluster randomized controlled study. Journal of Safety Research, 43 (2), 123-128.
  9. CPNTools, 2017. CPNTools 4.0. Downloaded from http://cpntools.org/.
  10. DaCosta, M., Krinsley, J., and Abelson, B., 2015. Optimizing local smoke alarm inspections with
    federal data. Bloomberg Data for Good Exchange 2015.
  11. Galindo, G., and Batta, R., 2013. Review of recent developments in OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 230 (2), 201-211.
  12. Ghosh, D., Chun, S.A., Shafiq, B. and Adam, N.R., 2016. Big data‐based smart city platform: Realtime
    crime analysis. Proceedings of the 17th 11.21%
  13. Greene, B.W., 2014. CSSP environmental scan 2013. Scientific Report DRDC-RDDC-2014-R83,
    Defence Research and Development Canada, September 2014.
  14. Haghani, A., and Afshar, A.M., 2009. Supply chain management in disaster response. Final project
    report submitted to the Mid-Atlantic Universities Transportation Center, September 2009. Accessed
    at https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/34430.
  15. Halpern, J., Isherwood, G.D., and Wand, Y., 1979. The relationship between response time and fire
    property losses. Infor, 17 (4), 373-389.
  16. LHostikka, S., and Keski-Rahkonen, O., 2003. Probabilistic simulation of fire scenarios. Nuclear
    Engineering and Design, 224 (3), 301-311.
  17. Kang, H.J., Choi, J., Lee, D., and Park, B.J., 2017. A framework for using computational fire simulations in the early phases of ship design. Ocean Engineering, 129 (complete), 335-342.
  18. Madaio, M., Chen, S-T., Haimson, O.L., Zhang, W., Cheng, X., Hinds-Aldrich, M., Chau, D.H., and Dilkina, B., 2016. Firebird: predicting fire risk and prioritizing fire inspections in Atlanta. http://www.kdd.org/kdd2016/papers/files/adf0511-madaioA.pdf.
  19. Madaio, M., Chen, S-T., Haimson, O.L., Zhang, W., Salem, A.M., 2016. Use of Monte Carlo Simulation to
    assess uncertainties in fire consequence calculation. Ocean Engineering, 117 (complete), 411-430.
    Cheng, X., Hinds-Aldrich, M., Chau, D.H., and Dilkina, B., 2016. Firebird: predicting fire risk and prioritizing fire inspections in Atlanta. http://www.kdd.org/kdd2016/papers/files/adf0511- madaioA.pdf.
  20. Solis, A.O., Asgary A., Nosedal-Sánchez, J., and Zaccaro, B., 2018. Developing a fire response test bench based on NFID. Project report submitted to the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs, 1 March 2018.
  21. Vaira, K., Hammond, G., and Rusnock, C., 2016. Improving fire station turn-out-time using discreteevent simulation. Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 3686-3687. December 11-14, Washington, DC, USA.
  22. VFRS, 2016. Vaughan Fire & Rescue Service 2016 Annual Report.
  23. Wuschke, K., Clare, J., and Garis, L., 2013. Temporal and geographic clustering of residential structure
    fires: A theoretical platform for targeted fire prevention. Fire Safety Journal, 62 (Part A), 3-12.