1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2018
  4. EMSS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2018.emss.020

Including co-simulation in modeling and simulation tool for supporting risk management in industrial context

  • a Simon Gorecki  ,
  • d Youssef Bouanan   , 
  • c Judicael Ribault  , 
  • d Gregory Zacharewicz   , 
  • e Nicolas Perry  
  • a , b , c, d Univ. Bordeaux, Lab. IMS, UMR CNRS 5218, 33400, Talence, France, (e)Arts et métiers, ParisTech, ENSAM of Bordeaux, France
Cite as
Gorecki S., Bouanan Y., Ribault J., Zacharewicz G., Perry N. (2018). Including co-simulation in modeling and simulation tool for supporting risk management in industrial context. Proceedings of the 30th European Modeling & Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2018), pp. 143-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.emss.020.

Abstract

Due to increasing complexity of engineered system of systems, development of software to design and support them must tend to be more and more concurrent and distributed. To more easily tackle these systems design, global problem is decomposed into several sub-ones where each sub problem is allocated and solved by different contributors. Each participant develops a fragment of the global solution that need after to be integrated with other ones. In this paper we present an extension to the UML/BPMN modeling and simulation tool: Papyrus. This module allows to factor complex tasks during the modelling step and simulation execution process. In detail, we propose to add risk management and other potential interruptions features to BPMN models and Simulation. This is made possible according to Functional Mock-up Interface standard, a cosimulation standard that define how to orchestrate components while simulation execution process.

References

  1. Altuhhova, Olga, Raimundas Matulevicius, and Naved Ahmed. 2013. “An Extension of BPMN for Security Risk Management.” International Journal of Information System Modeling and Desigh, January, pp 93-113.
  2. Bastian, Jens, Christoph Clauß, Susann Wolf, and Peter Schneider. 2011. “Master for Co-Simulation UsingFMI.” Proceedings of the 8th International Modelica Conference, March, 115–20. 
  3. Benama, oussef. 2014. “Supporting Make or Buy Decision for Reconfigurable Manufacturing
    System, in Multi-Site Context.” Ajaccio, France, September, 150–58.
  4. Better, Marco, Fred Glover, Garry Kochenberger, and Haibo Wang. 2008. “Simulation Optimization Applications in Risk Management.” Internationa Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2008, World Scientific Publishing Company edition.
  5. Blochwitz, Torsten. 2016. “Functional Mock-up Interface for Model Exchange and Co-Simulation.” https://www.fmi-standard.org/Downloads.
  6. Blochwitz, Torsten, Martin Otter, Johan Åkesson, Martin Arnold, Christoph Clauss, Hilding Elmqvist, Markus Fredrich, et al. 2012. “Functional Mockup Interface 2.0: The Standard for Tool Independent Exchange of Simulation Models.” Proceedings of the 9th International Modelica Conference, Munich, Germany, January, 173–84.
  7. Camus, Benjamin, Virginie Galtier, Mathieu Caujolle, Vincent Chevrier, Julien Vaubourg, Laurent
    Ciarletta, and Christine Bourjot. 2016. “Hybrid Co- Simulation of FMUs Using DEV&DESS in
    MECSYCO.” Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation, Pasadena, USA, January, 1–8.
  8. Dubois, Eric, Patrick Heumans, Nicolas Mayer, and Raimundas Matulevicius. 2010. “A Systematic Approach to Define the Domain of Information System Security Risk Management, Edit Dubois, Patrick Heymans.” Intentional Perspectives on Information Systems Engineering, 2010.
  9. El Amine, Mehdi. 2016. “Integration of Concept Maturity in Decision-Making for Engineering
    Design: An Application to a Solar Collector Development.” Springer-Verlag, London, October,
    235–50.
  10. Guermazi, Sahar, Jérémie Tatibouet, Arnaud Cuccuru, Saadia Dhouib, and Sébastien Gérard. 2015. “Executable Modeling with FUML and Alf in Papyrus: Tooling and Experiments.” EXE MoDELS, 2015.
  11. IEEE Computer Society. 2003. IEEE Recommended Practice for Distributed Simulation Engineering and Execution Process.
  12. IEEE Computer Society. 2010. IEEE Standard 1516- 2010 for M&S - HLA - Framework and Rules.
    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumb er=5553440.
  13. Marcinkowski, Bartosz, and Michal Kuciapski. 2012. “A Business Process Modeling Notation Extension for Risk Handling.” International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management, September, 374–81.
  14. Piegay, Nicolas, and Denys Breysse. 2015. “Multi- Objective Optimization and Decision Aid for
    Spread Footing Design in Uncertain Environment.” Geotechnical Safety and Risk 5, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, October, 419–24.
  15. Rodney, Elodie. 2014. “Integrating Risks in Project Management.” 16th International Dependency and Structure Modelling, Paris, June, 419–24.
  16. Sievert, Nicke. 2016. “Modelica Models in a Distributed Environment Using FMI and HLA.”