1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2018
  4. EMSS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2018.emss.026

Analysis of resource management methodologies for the development of discrete event simulation models representative of the works developed i shipyards

  • a Adolfo Lamas-Rodríguez   ,
  • b David Chas-Álvarez  ,
  • c  José Antonio Muiña-Dono  
  • aUniversidade da Coruña, Navantia, UMI Navantia-UDC
  • bUMI Navantia-UDC, (c)Universidade da Coruña
Cite as
Lamas-Rodríguez A., Chas-Álvarez D., Muiña-Dono J.A. (2018). Analysis of resource management methodologies for the development of discrete event simulation models representative of the works developed in shipyards. Proceedings of the 30th European Modeling & Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2018), pp. 187-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.emss.026

Abstract

Nowadays it is very common for certain types of workshops to organize their work based on predefined milestones from the beginning of the project. In shipbuilding, it is common for the primary manufacturing workshops to work according to the milestones established by the final assembly. Similarly, offshore wind projects that are currently being developed in different shipyards work in the same way. In addition, it is common in these manufacturing projects apply high penalties in case of non-compliance with established delivery milestones. Likewise, the usual work done in the shipyards have a high dependence on labor, so it seems interesting to study different resource allocation methodologies in order to develop the simulation models that represented the manufacturing processes developed in a shipyard.

References

  1. Cappadonna, F. a., Costa, a., & Fichera, S. (2013). Makespan minimization of unrelated parallel machines with limited human resources. Procedia CIRP, 12, 450–455. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.09.077
  2. Henrique, T., Pinheiro, G., Santos, A., & Venâncio, C. R. (2014). A hybrid Lagrangean metaheuristic for single machine scheduling problem with sequencedependent setup times and due dates.
  3. Musial, Walter et al. 2016. “2016 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report, U.S. Depart-ment of Energy.”: 131. http:/www.osti.gov/scitech.
  4. Lantz, E., Hand, M., and Wiser, R. 2012. “The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy.” World Renewables Energy Forum 2012 (August): 1–10.
  5. Park, P. (1990). A study of labor assignment rules with bottlenecks. Omega, 18(3), 247–257.
    doi:10.1016/0305-0483(90)90039-C
  6. Scholz-reiter, B., Heger, J., & Hildebrandt, T. (2009). Analysis And Comparison Of Dispatching Rule-Based Scheduling In Dual-Resource Constrained Shop-Floor Scenarios, II.
  7. Scudder, G., Hoffmann, T. (1986). The Use of Value- Based Rules to Avoid Shop Disruption. Omega, 14, 259-264. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(8690046-0)
  8. Treleven, M. (1985). An investigation of labor assignment rules in a dual-constrained job shop.
    Journal of Operations Management, 6(1), 51–68. doi: 10.1016/0272-6963(85)90035-X