1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2018
  4. MAS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2018.mas.002

Methods of constructing the systems of monitoring the technological process execution

  • a Vladimis A. Kholopov , 
  • b Anna G. Shmeleva , 
  • c Elizaveta N. Kashirskaya ,
  • d Evgeny V. Kurnasov 
  • a,b,c,d Moscow Technological University (MIREA), Moscow, Russia
Cite as
Kholopov V.A., Shmeleva A.G., Kashirskaya E.N., Kurnasov E.V. (2018). Methods of constructing the systems of monitoring the technological process execution. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2018), pp. 8-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.mas.002

Abstract

The paper describes the development of practical methodology for constructing the systems of monitoring the technological processes execution in digital machinery production. The methodology is primarily designed for controlling the machining technological processes in the metal-cutting workshop. In order to implement the system of monitoring the execution of technological processes in low-volume/ high-variety production the paper sets the tasks of defining the initial system condition, identifying the most significant factors, evaluating the probability of completing technological operations, modeling the flow of each technological process in the workshop. The paper also justifies the applicability of the expert evaluation method, the Pareto method, and neural network usage for developing the system. A flow chart of the simulation modeling of monitoring the technological process implementation is suggested; the chart demonstrates the interrelation between the methods of analyzing the technological processes described in the paper. Basing on the simulation modeling results it is possible to draw the conclusion that all technological processes will be completed during the work shift and also to identify the possible causes of failures before the production cycle is complete.

References

  1. Romanov A., Romanov M., Kharchenko A., Kholopov V., 2016. Unified architecture of execution level hardware and software for discrete machinery manufacturing control systems. Proceedings – 14th IEEE Student Conference on Research and Development: Advancing Technology for Humanity, SCOReD 2016, p. 7810088. December 13-14, Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia). DOI: 10.1109/SCORED.2016.7810088
  2. Kashirskaya E.N., Kurnasov E.V., Kholopov V.A., Shmeleva A.G., 2017. Methodology for assessing the implementation of the production process. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2017, pp. 232–235. October 25-27, St. Petersburg (Russia). DOI: 10.1109/CTSYS.2017.8109533
  3. Kashirskaya E.N., Kholopov V.A., Shmeleva A.G., Kurnasov E.V., 2017. Simulation model for monitoring the execution of technological processes. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2017, pp. 307–310. October 25-27, St. Petersburg (Russia). DOI: 10.1109/CTSYS.2017.8109553
  4. Desineni R., Berndlmaier Z., Winslow J., Blauberg A., Chu B.R., 2007. The Grand Pareto: A methodology for identifying and quantifying yield detractors in volume semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 20(2), pp. 87-100. May 07. DOI: 10.1109/TSM.2007.896641
  5. Kalach G.G., Romanov A.M., Tripolskiy P.E., 2016. Loosely coupled navigation system based on expert system using fuzzy logic. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements, SCM 2016, pp. 167-169. May 25-27, St. Petersburg (Russia). DOI: 10.1109/SCM.2016.7519717
  6. Dmitriev S.A., Khalyasmaa A.I., Doroshenko V.O., Romanov A.M., 2016. Fuzzy dynamic model of power equipment state assessment. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE North West Russia Section Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Conference, EIConRusNW 2016, pp. 547-552. February 2-3, St. Petersburg (Russia). DOI: 10.1109/EIConRusNW.2016.7448242
  7. Huang P.B., Shiang W.-J., Jou Y.-T., Chang C., Ma C., 2010. An in-process adaptive control of surface roughness in end milling operations. 2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, ICMLC 2010, vol. 3, pp. 1191-1194. July 11-14, Qingdao (China). DOI: 10.1109/ICMLC.2010.5580906
  8. Jin Y., Sendhoff B., 2008. Pareto-based multiobjective machine learning: An overview and case studies. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 38(3), pp. 397-415. DOI: 10.1109/TSMCC.2008.919172
  9. Chizhikov V.I., Kurnasov E.V., Vorob’ev E.I., 2018. Capture of an object on the basis of tactile surface recognition. Russian Engineering Research, 38(4), pp. 251–255. DOI: 10.3103/S1068798X18040044
  10. Chao L., Peichen H., Jianping W., 2014. A study of semiconductor industry accidents: Making predictions based on BP artificial neural networks. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 492-496. December 10-13, Bangkok (Thailand). DOI: 10.1109/IEEM.2013.6962460
  11. Eroshenko S.A., Romanov A.M., 2016. Decision support system for science-technical solutions efficiency assessment based on hybrid neural networks. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements, SCM 2016, pp. 462-465. May 25-27, St. Petersburg (Russia). DOI: 10.1109/SCM.2016.7519814