Linear regression and agent-based modeling approach for equipment market value predict

  • Lingzi Wu 
  • Mostafa Ali 
  • Estacio Pereira ,
  • d Simaan M. AbouRizk 
  • a,b,c,d Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2W2
Cite as
Wu L., Ali M., Pereira E., AbouRizk S.M. (2018). Linear regression and agent-based modeling approach for equipment market value predict. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2018), pp. 15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.mas.003

Abstract

The acquisition, ownership, and operation costs of construction equipment represent a considerable portion of a general contractor’s budget. The ability to accurately estimate the current market value of equipment is vital for successful fleet management. Although market valuation models have been built, they do not consider the impact of human behavior on selling price. Understanding basic auction mechanisms and the relationships between human behavior and selling price would improve the credibility and accuracy of equipment market value estimation—particularly for construction equipment, which is often sold at auction. This research proposes a hybrid linear regression and simulation modeling approach to uncover patterns in historical equipment resale data and to use these data, in consideration of human behavior, to simulate a typical North American equipment auction. Feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated through a case
study.

References

  1. Anatolitis V., and Welisch M., 2017. Putting renewable energy auctions into action – an agent-based model of onshore wind power auctions in Germany. Energy Policy, 110, 394-402.
  2. Cliff D., 2003. Explorations in evolutionary design of online auction market mechanisms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 162-175.
  3. Farnia F., Frayret, J., Lebel, L., & Beaudry, C. 2017. Agent-based simulation of multiple-round timber combinatorial auction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 47(1), 1-9.
  4. Huang J., Liu L., Shi L. 2016. Auction policy analysis: an agent-based simulation optimization model of grain market. Proceeding of Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 3417-3428. December 11-14, Arlington (Virginia, USA).
  5. Lucking-Reiley, D., 1999. Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the internet. The American Economic Review, 89 (5), 1063-1080.
  6. Lucko G., 2003. A statistical analysis and model of the residual value of different types of heavy construction equipment. Thesis (PhD). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
  7. Lucko G., 2011. Modeling the residual market value of construction equipment under changed economic conditions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137 10, 806-816.
  8. North M. J., Collier N. T., Ozik, J., Tatara, E. R., Macal, C. M., Bragen, M., & Sydelko, P., 2013. Complex adaptive systems modeling with repast simphony. Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling, 1(1).
  9. Peurifoy R. L., Schexnayder C. J., and Shapira, A., 2006. Construction planning, equipment, and methods. 7th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  10. R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available from: https://www.R-project.org [accessed Jan. 19, 2018].
  11. Vickrey W., 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. The Journal of Finance, 16, 8-37
  12. Vidal, J. M. 2006. Fundamentals of multiagent systems. Available from : http://jmvidal.cse.sc.edu/papers/mas.pdf [accessed April 14, 2018].
  13. Zhang W., Bi Z., and Shen D., 2017. Investor structure and the price–volume relationship in a continuous double auction market: An agent-based modeling perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 467, 345-355.
  14. Zong Y., 2017. Maintenance cost and residual value prediction of heavy construction equipment. Thesis (Master). University of Alberta.