Cash and voucher impact factor in humanitarian aid: a system dynamic analysis

  • Fahimeh Allahi 
  • b Roberto Revetria  ,
  • c Roberto Cianci  
  • a Wolfson Department, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, UK
  • b,c DIME, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
Cite as
Allahi F., Revetria R., Cianci R. (2018). Cash and voucher impact factor in humanitarian aid: a system dynamic analysis. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2018), pp. 106-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.mas.017

Abstract

Natural and man-made disasters seem unpredictable every year, increasing a wide range of universal sufferers. Several people are affected by the direct outcomes of these disasters, and their life depends on disaster relief aid administered by humanitarian organizations. Recently, there has been renewed interest in cash distribution in the humanitarian sector during disaster relief to increase access of vulnerable people to supporting services such as health or education and develop their life’s condition while rising the efficiency of humanitarian organizations committed to the program. The research proposes a casual-loop and system dynamic model to assess multi aspects of related impact factors to provide optimal support to beneficiaries. The model provides a decision-making framework with a high-level overview of the interactions between the economy, education, health, and the psychological aspects of recipient’s life, provide a system dynamics analysis including relationships that could have led to improve the vulnerable people's condition life.

References

  1. Aker, J.C., 2017. Comparing cash and voucher transfers in a humanitarian context: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo. The World Bank Economic Review, 31(1), 44-70.
  2. Allahi F., Leeuw S.D., Sabet E., Kian S., Damiani L., Giribone P., Revetria R., Cianci R., 2018. A Review of System Dynamics Models Applied in Social and Humanitarian Researches. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2018, 4-6 July, London, U.K.
  3. Cerreto F., 2015. Micro-simulation based analysis of railway lines robustness. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Railway Operations Modelling and Analysis, pp. 164-1 – 164-13. March 23-26, Narashino, Japan.
  4. Berg, M.I.C.H.E.L.L.E., Mattinen, H.A.N.N.A. and Pattugaian, G., 2013. Examining Protection and Gender in Cash and Voucher Transfers.
  5. Briano E., Caballini C., Giribone P., Revetria R., 2010. Using a system dynamics approach for designing and simulation of short life-cycle products supply chain. In Proceedings of the 4th WSEAS international conference on Computer engineering and applications, Jan 27, pp. 143-149, World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
  6. Briano E., Caballini C., Mosca R., Revetria R., Testa A., 2010. Proposing a System Dynamic approach to assess and improve Italian ports competitiveness. Proceedings of ACMOS, May 29, pp. 29-31.
  7. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), 2014. The international disaster database.
  8. Cunha, J. 2014. Testing Paternalism: Cash versus In-Kind Transfers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
  9. Currie, J. and Gahvari F., 2008. Transfers in Cash and In-Kind: Theory Meets the Data. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(2), 333-383.
  10. Doocy, S., Gabriel, M., Collins, S., Robinson, C. and Stevenson, P., 2006. Implementing cash for work programmes in post‐tsunami Aceh: experiences and lessons learned. Disasters, 30(3), 277-296.
  11. Doocy, S. and Tappis, H., 2016. Cash-based approaches in humanitarian emergencies, a systematic review April 2016.
  12. Gentilini, U., Maddalena H. and Rsulan Y., 2014. The state of social safety nets 2014. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.
  13. Harvey, P., 2005. Cash and Vouchers in Emergencies. Humanitarian Policy Group Discussion Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  14. Revetria R., Oliva F., Mosca M., 2008. Modelling of Voltri terminal Europe in Genoa using system dynamic model simulation. In Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS international conference on System science and simulation in engineering, Nov 21, pp. 411-417. World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS).
  15. Schule F., Bitar J., Uekermann F., Taki M., Saidi M., al Omran S., Choufari B., Meerkatt H., 2017. Foodrestricted voucher or unrestricted cash? How to best support Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon. Conducted by the Boston Consulting Group.
  16. Sterman J.D., 2000. Business Dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world, McGraw-Hill, Boston.
  17. Tabor, S., 2002. Assisting the Poor with Cash: Design and Implementation of Social Transfer Programs. World Bank Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0223.
  18. Tomasini R.M. and Wassenhove L.V., A framework to unravel, prioritize and coordinate vulnerability and complexity factors affecting a humanitarian response operation, 2004. Working Paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.