Decision support method for using virtual reality in education based on a cost benefit-analysis

  • Polina Häfner  
  • bJana Dücker  
  • cCharline Schlatt  
  • Jivka Ovtcharova  
  • acdKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Information Management in Engineering
  • bFZI Research Center for Information Technology
Cite as
P. Häfner, J. Dücker, C. Schlatt, J. Ovtcharova (2018). Decision support method for using virtual reality in education based on a cost benefit-analysis. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of The Virtual And Augmented Reality In Education (VARE 2018), pp. 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2018.vare.017

Abstract

Virtual reality is becoming increasingly popular, especially for education and training. Many schoolings or training domains can profit from it. Until now, there is few guidance on when and how to employ such technologies. In this paper, we propose a method for analyzing step by step if a course can profit from the use
of immersive virtual environments. Specific indicators were identified and compiled into a questionnaire that
can be used to assess for which courses the use of virtual reality could be beneficial. An existing course situation is analyzed from different perspectives, as students, educators or the management might perceive it differently. As a further step, the paper contains a guideline on how to carry out the feasibility studies in the context of virtual reality learning environments. The profitability of the investment is investigated from different angles in order to allow a well-founded decision. The procedure is then carried out on sample use cases to validate the method.

References

  1. Betts, J. (30 May 2016). Education in the Future: VR and AR. [Accessed on 02. February 2018] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etn2zCa7 n40
  2. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educationalobjectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain. NewYork: McKay, 20-24.
  3. Bremer, T. (08 June 2017). Ausbildung mit VirtualReality. Available Lernen in einer anderen Welt. from:https://detektor.fm/digital/ausbildung-mitvirtual-reality [Accessed on 02 February 2018]
  4. Broll, W. (2013). Augmentierte Realität. In R. Dörner, W. Broll, P. Grimm, & B. Jung, Virtual und Augmented Reality (VR/AR) (p. 241-294). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
  5. Bösch, M. (2016). Finanzwirtschaft: Investition,Finanzierung, Finanzmärkte und Steuerung (3.
    Auflage Ausg.). München: Franz Vahlen.
  6. Burdea, G. & Coiffet, P. (2003): Virtual realitytechnology. Presence: Teleoperators andVirtual Environments 12(6), 663–664
  7. DB Systel. (2018). Engaging Virtual Education.Interaktive Available 3D- & VR-Lernanwendungen.from:https://www.dbsystel.de/dbsystel/digitalisierun
    g/ventures/eve-immersive-technolog-419678 [Accessed on 15 February 2018].
  8. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. science, 323(5910), 66-69.
  9. Dücker, J., Häfner, P., & Ovtcharova, J. (2016, June). Methodology for Efficiency Analysis of VR Environments for Industrial Applications. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (pp. 72-88). Springer, Cham.
  10. Fleming, N., & Baume, D. (2006). Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree!. Educational Developments, 7(4), 4.
  11. Fronius. (2017). Schweissausbildung der Zukunft: Fronius Virtual Welding. Available from: http://www.fronius.com/de/schweisstechnik/k ompetenzen/schweissausbildung/virtualwelding[Accessed on 03 February 2018].
  12. Furrer, H. (2009). Das Berner Modell: ein Instrument für eine kompetenzorientierte Didaktik. HepVerlag,
  13. Gallagher, A. G., Ritter, E. M., Champion, H., Higgins, G. F., Moses, G., & Smith, C. D. (2005). Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Annals of Surgery, 241 (2), 364-372.
  14. Günther, W. A., Walch, D., & Wulz, J. (17 November 2006). Virtual Reality: Eintauchen in die digitale Welt. Available from: http://www.fml.mw.tum.de/fml/images/Publik ationen/Eintauchen_in_die_digitale_Welt.pdf Accessed on 02 Feburary 2018].
  15. Häfner, P., Häfner V., & Ovtcharova, J. "Experiencing physical and technical phenomena in schools using virtual reality driving simulator." International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Springer, Cham, 2014.
  16. Heinzelmeier, A. (2018). Implementation of an Immersive Haptic Training Simulation for an Industrial Sewing Process. Master thesis. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  17. Hill, T. & Westbrook, R.: SWOT analysis: it’s time for a product recall. Long Range Plan. 30(1), 46– 52 (1997)
  18. Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (November 2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55 (3), p. 1171-1182.
  19. Ifediora, C. O., Idoko, O. R., & Nzekwe, J. (2014). Organization’s stability and productivity: The role of SWOT analysis-An acronym for strength, weakness, opportunities and threat. International Journal of Innovative and Applied Research, 2(9), 23-32.
  20. Jank W. & Meyer H. (1994): Didaktische Modelle. 3. Auflage. Cornelsen, Berlin 1994. S. 16 u. 17.
  21. Janssen, J.-K. (25 March 2017). Mit dem Akkuschrauber am ICE 4: Deutsche Bahn lernt in VR.Available from: https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Mit -dem-Akkuschrauber-am-ICE-4-DeutscheBahn-lernt-in-VR-3664274.html [Accessed on 15 February 2018]
  22. Janz, K., Häfner, P., & Ovtcharova J. “Virtueller Fahrlehrer für Megacities”. RESEARCH TO BUSINESS: Newsletter Technologietransfer und Innovation Ed.1|2018
  23. Jung, B., Vitzthum, A. (2013). Virtuelle Welten. In R. Dörner, W. Broll, P. Grimm, & B. Jung, Virtual und Augmented Reality (VR/AR) (p. 65-95). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
  24. Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based methods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons.
  25. KVE. (2012). Kompetenzzentrum Virtual Engineering Rhein-Neckar. Vorlesungen am KVE. Available from: http://www.kvern.de/more/Projekte/Vorlesungen_am_KVE [Accessed on 02 February 2018]
  26. Kunst, S. (2006). Konzeption eines Modells zur Bewertung der Wirtschaftlichkeit von VirtualReality-Systemen in der Digitalen Fabrik. diplom.de.
  27. Linde, A. S., & Kunkler, K. (2016). The Evolution of Medical Training Simulation in the U.S. Military. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, 22, 209-214.
  28. Loftin R. et al., (1997). Virtual Environment Technology in Training. Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Mission of 1993. In R. J. Seidel, & P. R. Chatelier, Virtual Reality, Training's Future? (6.ed. Ausg., p. 93-103). Boston, MA: Springer.
  29. MacGillivray, I. (20 July 2017). Google AR and VR. Daydream Labs: Teaching Skills in VR. Available from: https://www.blog.google/products/googlevr/daydream-labs-teaching-skills-vr/ [Accessed on 13. February 2018].
  30. Mantovani, F. (2001). VR learning: Potential and challenges for the use of 3D environments in education and training. In R. Guiseppe, & C. Galimberti, Towards cyberpsychology: Mind, cognitions and society in the internet age (p.207 - 226). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  31. Maschuw, K., Hassan, I., & Bartsch, D. (2010). Chirurgisches Training am Simulator. Der Chirurg, 81 (1), 19-24.
  32. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2. ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Minocha, S. (2015). The state of virtual reality in education—Shape of things to come. International Journal of Engineering Research, 4(11), 596-598.
  34. Oculus. (07 July 2017). VR's Healthcare Revolution: Transforming Medical Training. Available from: https://www.oculus.com/blog/vrshealthcare-revolution-transforming-medicaltraining/ [Accessed on 14. February 2018].
  35. Pantelidis, V. S. (1995). Reasons to use virtual reality in education. VR in the Schools, 1, 9.
  36. Pantelidis, V. S. (1996). Suggestions on when to use and when not to use virtual reality in education. VR in the Schools, 2 (1), 18.
  37. Pantelidis, V. S. (2010). Reasons to Use Virtual Reality in Education and Training Courses and a Model to Determine When to Use Virtual Reality. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 59-70.
  38. PELe, Redaktionsteam. (2006). "Didaktische Modelle." e-taching. org, Portalbereich Didaktisches
    Design. Available from: http://www. eteaching.org/didaktik/theorie/didaktik_allg/D idaktische% 20Modelle_19_07_06_bg. pdf, [Accessed on: 13 June 2010]
  39. Psotka, J. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 5 (6), 405-431.
  40. Rizzo, A. S., & Kim, G. J. (2005). A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual
    Environments, 14(2), 119-146.
  41. Schlatt, C. (2018). Entwicklung eines Modells zur Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse von Virtual RealityTechnologien in Lernumgebungen. Master thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
  42. Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., et al. (2002). Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance. Results of a Randomized, Double-Blinded Study. Annals of Surgery, 236 (4), 458-464.
  43. Simandan, D. (2013) "Introduction: Learning as a geographical process." The Professional Geographer 65.3: 363-368.
  44. Sherman, W. R., & Craig, A. B. (2002). Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design. Elsevier.
  45. Stambolieva, M. (08 Dezember 2017). hochschulforum digitalisierung. Horizont erweitern: Aktives Lernen mit Virtual/Augmented Reality. Available from: https://hochschulforumdigitalisierung.de/de/bl
    og/horizont-erweitern-aktives-lernen-virtualaugmented-reality [Accessed on 02 February
    2018]
  46. Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C. & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 471-488. 
  47. IWRC (2018). Iowa Waste Reduction Center. University of Northern Iowa. Virtual Paint. Available from: https://iwrc.uni.edu/virtualpaint Accessed on 02. February 2018].
  48. VDC (2014). Whitepaper von Head Mounted Displays & Datenbrillen - Einsatz und Systeme: Virtual
    Dimension Center.
  49. Völger Winsky, M. (2014). Wissenschaftliche Redlichkeit und die Generation der Digital Natives – Eine hochschuldidaktische Perspektive. Information-Wissenschaft & Praxis, 65 (1), 9-18.
  50. Warnecke, H.-J., & Bullinger, H.-J. (1993). Virtual Reality: Anwendungen und Trends. Berlin Heidelberg, USA: Springer Verlag.