1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2019
  4. EMSS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2019.emss.033

Simulation improves efficiency and quality in shoe manufacturing

  • a Mohan Mano Hassan  ,
  • b Sai Priyanka Kalamraju  ,
  • c Sandeep Dangeti  ,
  •  d Sirisha Pudipeddi  ,
  • e Edward J Williams  
  • a,b,c,d,e Business Analytics, College of Business, University of Michigan – Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, USA
Cite as
Hassan M.M., Kalamraju S.P., Dangeti S., Pudipeddi S., Williams E.J. (2019). Simulation improves efficiency and quality in shoe manufacturing. Proceedings of the 31st European Modeling & Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2019), pp. 231-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2019.emss.033.

Abstract

Discrete-event process simulation now has a long and distinguished history of supporting the improvement of manufacturing processes. From those origins, it has expanded its applicability to supply chains, service industries, health care, and public transport. In manufacturing contexts, simulation modeling and analysis regularly helps fine-tune the trade-off between high inventory versus danger of stockout, improve and balance machine utilization, schedule workers more effectively, and improve performance metrics such as average and maximum times in queue and average and maximum length of queues. In the present work, the authors describe a successful application of simulation to the manufacture of footwear. The original manufacturing process was beset by problems including low throughput, high headcount, overly high or low machine utilization, unduly large rejection rates, and ergonomic concerns. The simulation and analysis project described in this paper guided significant improvements, including doubling the output while reducing worker headcount to two-thirds of its initial value.

References

  1. Benneyan, C., 1998. Distribution fitting software makes simulation more attractive, viable in many applications. OR/MS Today (98:38,1-10)
  2. Eryilmaz, M., Kuşakci, A., Gavranovic, H., and Findik, F., 2012. Southeast Europe Journal of Soft Computing (1:1, 120-127).
  3. Mirzapourrezaei, S., Lalmazloumian, M., Dargi, A., and Wong, K., 2011. Simulation of a manufacturing assembly line based on WITNESS. Proceedings of the 2011 Third International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Systems, and Networks, 132-137. July 26-28, Bali (Indonesia).
  4. Mourtzis, D., Doukas, M., and Bernidaki, D., 2014. Simulation in manufacturing: Review and challenges. Proceedings of 8th DET International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, 213-229. March 25-28, Stuttgart (Germany).
  5. Nakayama, M., 2003. Analysis of simulation output. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, Volume 1, 49-58. December 7-10, New Orleans, Louisana (United States of America).
  6. Prochaska, K. and Thiesing, R., 2017. Introduction to Simio. Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, 4410-4419. December 3-6, Las Vegas, Nevada (United States of America).
  7. Ramzan, M. B., Qureshi, S. M., Mari, S. I., Memon, M. S., Mittal, M., Imran, M., and Iqbal, M. W., 2019. Effect of time-varying factors on optimal combination of quality inspectors for offline inspection station. Mathematics (7:1, 51-68)
  8. Sällström, J. and Schmidt, H., 1984. Cervicobrachial disorders in certain occupations, with special reference to compression in the thoracic outlet. American Journal of Industrial Medicine (6:1, 45-52).
  9. Smith, J., Sturrock, D., and Kelton, W., 2018. Simio and simulation: Modeling, analysis, applications. 5th ed. Sewickley, Pennsylvania (United States of America): Simio LLC.
  10. Solomon, H., Jilcha, K., and Berhan, E., 2014. Lead time prediction using simulation in leather shoe manufacturing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (334:283-292).
  11. Sturrock, D. 2018., Avoid failures! Tested success tips for simulation product excellence. Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, 252-260. December 2018, Göteborg (Sweden).
  12. Weinswig, D., 2016. Sneaker culture fuels $1 billion secondary market. 18 March, 22.