A model of pilot study to assess the risk of exposure to surgical smokes for operating room personnel

  • Marco Frascio  , 
  • b Matteo Mascherini  , 
  • c Paola Batistotti  , 
  • d Katia Cortesei  , 
  • d Rosario Fornaro 
  • a,b,c,e DISC Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate Università degli Studi di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132 Genova, Italy - Ospedale Policlinico IRCCS San Martino Genova - Italy
  • d DIMES Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale Università di Genova – Italy
Cite as
Frascio M., Mascherini M., Batistotti P., Cortese K., Fornaro R. (2019). A model of pilot study to assess the risk of exposure to surgical smokes for operating room personnel. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Innovative Simulation for Healthcare (IWISH 2019), pp. 44-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2019.iwish.008

Abstract

During the last decades the exposure to surgical smokes has been a long-standing concern both in open and laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this project is to assess the health risks for medical operating room (OR) personnel associated with surgical plumes derived from laparoscopic procedures. The purpose of this model is to check the correlation between the concentration of toxic elements derived from electrosurgical procedures in the operating setting air and the concentration of the same substances in urine and plasma of patients and operating staff. Moreover, it will be considered also the correlation between toxic concentration and time of exposure. The results of the study could be relevant to indicate if individual protection devices are efficacious to make the surgical procedure safe for patients and staff or if any quacy has to be considered. Some unexpected difficulties delayed the expected results.

References

  1. Ball K. 2007. Surgical smoke: is it safe to breathe? - Todays Surg Nurse. Sep-Oct, 18(5), 16-21.
  2. Balog J, Sasi-Szabó L, Kinross J, Lewis MR, Muirhead LJ, Veselkov K, Mirnezami R, Dezső B, Damjanovich L, Darzi A, Nicholson JK, Takáts Z. Intraoperative tissue identification using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 17,5(194):194.
  3. Barrett WL, Garber SM. 2003. Surgical smoke: a review of the literature. Is this just a lot of hot hair? -Surg Endosc. Jun, Review, 17(6), 979-87.
  4. Cavina E, Goletti O, Molea N, Buccianti P, Chiarugi M, Boni G, Lazzeri E, Bianchi R. 1998. Trocar site tumor recurrences. May pneumoperitoneum be responsible? - Surg Endosc. Nov, 12(11) 1294-6.
  5. Choi SH, Kwon TG, Chung SK, Kim TH. 2014. Surgical smoke may be a biohazard to surgeons performing laparoscopic surgery. - Surg Endosc. Aug, 28(8), 2374-80.
  6. Chowdhury KK, Meftahuzzaman SM, Rickta D, Chowdhury TK, Chowdhury BB, Ireen ST. 2011.
    Electrosurgical smoke: a real concern. Mymensingh Med J. Review. Jul, 20(3) 507-12
  7. DesCoteaux JG, Picard P, Poulin EC, Baril M. 1996. Preliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures. - Surg Endosc. Feb,10(2),152-8.
  8. Dobrogowski M, Wesolowski W, Kucharska M, Paduszyńska K, Dworzyńska A, Szymczak W,Sapota A, Pomorski L. . 2015. Health risk to medical personnel of surgical smoke produced during laparoscopic surgery. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 28(5), 831-40
  9. Dobrogowski M, Wesołowski W, Kucharska M, Sapota A, Pomorski LS. 2014 Chemical composition of surgical smoke formed in the abdominal cavity during laparoscopic cholecystectomy--assessment of the risk to the patient. Int J Occup Med Environ Health.
    Apr,27(2), 314-25.
  10. Fan JK, Chan FS, Chu KM. 2009. Surgical Smoke. Asian J Surg. Oct, 32(4), 253-7.
  11. Fitzgerald JE, Malik M, Ahmed I. 2012. A single-blind controlled study of electrocautery and ultrasonic scalpel smoke plumes in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. Feb, 26(2), 337-42
  12. Fletcher JN, Mew D, DesCoteaux JG. 1999. Dissemination of melanoma cells within electrocautery plume. Am J Surg, 178:57–9.
  13. Fornaro R., Frascio M., Stabilini C., Lazzara, F., Gianetta, E. 2008. Crohn's disease surgery: problems of postoperative recurrence. Chirurgia italiana, 60(6), 761-781.
  14. Chron's disease and cancer | [Malattia di Crohn e cancro] Fornaro, R., Frascio, M., Denegri, A., (...), Lazzara, F., Gianetta, E.2009 Annali Italiani di Chirurgia  80(2), pp. 119-12
  15. Gianella M, Hahnloser D, Rey JM, Sigrist MW. 2014. Quantitative chemical analysis of surgical smoke generated during laparoscopic surgery with a vesselsealing device. Surg Innov. Apr, 21(2), 170-9.
  16. Hubens G, Pauwels M, Hubens A, Vermeulen P, Van Marck E, Eyskens E. 1996. The influence of
    apneumoperitoneum on the peritoneal implantation of free intraperitoneal colon cancer cells. Surg Endosc. Aug, 10(8). 809-12.
  17. In SM, Park DY, Sohn IK, Kim CH, Lim HL, Hong SA, Jung DY, Jeong SY, Han JH, Kim HJ. 2015.
    Experimental study of the potential hazards of surgical smoke from powered instruments. Br J.
    Surg. Nov,102(12),1581-6.
  18. Minuto, M.; Varaldo, E.; Marcocci, G.; De Santanna, A.; Ciccone, E.; Cortese, K. 2018. ERBB1- and ERBB2 Positive Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Case Report. Diseases. 6, 25.
  19. Mowbray N, Ansell J, Warren N, Wall P, Torkington J. 2013. Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? A systematic review. - Surg Endosc. Sep, 27(9):3100-7.
  20. Nezhat C, Winer WK, Nezhat F, Nezhat C, Forrest D, Reeves WG. 1987. Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard? - Lasers Surg Med..7(4),376-  82.
  21. Ott DE. 1998. Carboxyhemoglobinemia due to peritoneal smoke absorption from laser tissue combustionat laparoscopy. J Clin Laser Med Surg. Dec,16(6), 309-15.
  22. Pierce JS, Lacey SE, Lippert JF, Lopez R, Franke JE. 2011. Laser-generated air contaminants from medical lase applications: a state-of-the-science review of exposure characterization, health effects and control. - J Occup Environ Hyg. Review Jul, 8(7),447-66.
  23. Rioux M, Garland A, Webster D, Reardon E. 2013. HPV positive tonsillar cancer in two laser surgeons: case reports. - J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Nov 18, 42-54.
  24. Stabilini C., Bracale U., Pignata G., Frascio M. Lazzara F., Gianetta, E. 2013. Trials Laparoscopic bridging vs. anatomic open reconstruction for midline abdominal hernia mesh repair [LABOR]: Single-blinded, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial on longterm functional results 14(1), 357
  25. Taffinder NJ, Champault G. 1996. Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy. - Br J Surg. Jan, 83(1), 133
  26. Tomita Y, Mihashi S, Nagata K, Ueda S, Fujiki M, Hirano M, Hirohata T. 1981. Mutagenicity of
    smokecondensates induced by CO2-laser irradiation and electrocauterization. - Mutat Res. Jun, 89(2), 145- 9.
  27. Ulmer B. 1998. Occupational Safety and Health Administration acts on guidelines for electrosurgical smoke. - AORN J, Jun;67(6), 1244-5.
  28. Watson DS. 2010. Surgical smoke evacuation during laparoscopic surgery. AORN J. 2010 Sep, 92(3), 347- 50.
  29. Weld KJ, Dryer S, Ames CD, Cho K, Hogan C, Lee M, Biswas P, Landman J. 2007. Analysis of surgical smoke produced by various energy-based instruments and effect on laparoscopic visibility. JEndourol. Mar,21(3), 347-51.
  30. Wu JS, Luttmann DR, Ulmer B, Meininger TA, Soper NJ. 1997. Production and systemic absorption of toxic byproducts of tissue combustion during laparoscopic surgery. - Surg Endosc. Nov, 11(11), 1075-9