Smart platform-based IoT-modules for applications in health care and rehabilitation

  • Volkhard Klinger 
  • aDepartment of Embedded Systems, University of Applied Science Hannover (FHDW), D.30173 Hannover, LS, Germany
Cite as
Klinger V. (2019). Smart platform-based IoT-modules for applications in health care and rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Innovative Simulation for Healthcare (IWISH 2019), pp. 77-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2019.iwish.014

Abstract

Embedded systems and the Internet of Things (IoT) enable new procedures, measurement and analysis methods in the field of biomedical systems. The measurement of data, based on electrocardiogram (ECG)-, electromyogram (EMG)- or electroneurogram (ENG)-signals, allows a multitude of new approaches in diagnosis, prevention or rehabilitation. As part of a project for ENG-based control of prostheses, a platform has been designed, called smart modular biosignal acquisition, identification and control system (SMoBAICS), that also uses IoT-devices. In this paper, different IoT-devices are presented and described. In the context of an analysis of use cases, it becomes clear that the platform represents a toolbox, which provides appropriate modules and module configurations for different requirements. The designed IoT-devices use standard interfaces in order to integrate a specific additional function into the system. In the focus are two microcontroller (mC)-devices with different characteristics and a front-end system that enables the connection of a variety of Force Sensing Resistor (FSR)-sensors. Based on this platform architecture, many applications were presented, and examples were given of how the required functionality for the corresponding application can be achieved with the help of these IoT-systems. This platform enables a fusion of the various sensor data with the objective of motion identification and prosthesis control based on this by reading out various data (forces, acceleration, ENG-data, etc.) and integrating identification algorithms.

References

  1. CDC (2016). Important facts about falls. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/fal
    ls/adultfalls.html
  2. Texas Instruments. (2015). Cc2650 simplelink multistandard wireless mcu. Technical report,
    Texas Instruments
  3. InvenSense (2014). Ps-mpu-9250a-01, mpu- 9250 product specification revision 1.0. Technical
    report, InvenSense Inc
  4. Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., and Jessell, T. M. (2000). Principles of Neural Science. Elsevier,
    New York, fourth edition
  5. Klinger, V. (2014). Verification concept for an electroneurogram based prosthesis control. In
    Bruzzone, A., Frascio, M., Novak, V., Longo, F., Merkuryev, Y., and Novak, V., editors, 3nd International Workshop on Innovative Simulation for Health Care (IWISH 2014).
  6. Klinger, V. (2015). Biosignal acquisition system for prosthesis control and rehabilitation monitoring. In Bruzzone, A., Frascio, M., Novak, V., Longo, F., Merkuryev, Y., and Novak, V., editors, 4nd International Workshop on Innovative Simulation for Health Care (IWISH 2015).
  7. Klinger, V. (2016). Rehabilitation Monitoring and Biosignal Identification using IoT-Modules. In
    Bruzzone, A., Frascio, M., Novak, V., Longo, F., Merkuryev, Y., and Novak, V., editors, 5n
    International Workshop on Innovative Simulation for Health Care (IWISH 2016).
  8. Klinger, V. (2018). Evaluation of Hardware-based Evolutionary Algorithms for the Identification of Motion-based Action Potentials in Neural Bundles. In Bruzzone, A., Frascio, M., Novak, V.,
    Longo, F., Merkuryev, Y., and Novak, V., editors, appears in: 7n International Workshop on
    Innovative Simulation for Health Care (IWISH 2018).
  9. Klinger, V. and Klauke, A. (2013). Identification of motion-based action potentials in neural bundles using an algorithm with multiagent technology. In Backfrieder, W., Frascio, M., Novak, V., Bruzzone, A., and Longo, F., editors, 2nd International Workshop on Innovative Simulation
    for Health Care (IWISH 2013).
  10. Law, A. M. and Kelton, W. D. (2000). Simulation Modeling and Analysis. McGraw-Hill
  11. Ryser, F., Bützer, T., Held, J. P., Lambercy, O., and Gassert, R. (2017). Fully embedded myoelectric control for a wearable robotic hand orthosis. In 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), pages 615– 621.
  12. Wu, Y., Jiang, D., Liu, X., Bayford, R., and Demosthenes, A. (2018). A human–machine
    inteface using electrical impedance tomography for hand prosthesis control. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 12(6):1322– 1333.
  13. Yang, G., Deng, J., Pang, G., Zhang, H., Li, J., Deng, B., Pang, Z., Xu, J., Jiang, M., Liljeberg, P., Xie,
    H., and Yang, H. (2018). An iot-enabled stroke rehabilitation system based on smart wearable
    armband and machine learning. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 6:1–10.
  14. Wu, Y., Jiang, D., Liu, X., Bayford, R., and Demosthenous, A. (2018). A human–machine
    interface using electrical impedance tomography for hand prosthesis control. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 12(6):1322– 1333.