1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2020
  4. EMSS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2020.emss.010

On school grounds: simulation of a school lockdown

  • a Oleg Chernoyarov , 
  • b Vladimir Litvinenko , 
  • c Boris Matveev  
  • a,b Columbus State University, 4225 University Ave, Columbus, GA, 31907, USA
  • c Auburn University, 345 W Magnolia Ave, Auburn, AL 36849, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA
Cite as
Streeter K., Angelopoulou A., Mykoniatis K. (2020). On school grounds: simulation of a school lockdown. Proceedings of the 32nd European Modeling & Simulation Symposium (EMSS 2020), pp. 72-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2020.emss.010

Abstract

Active shooter situations are becoming increasingly more frequent every year in the United States. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation reports, 20.6% of the incidents between 2000 and 2018 occurred at educational facilities. Thus, educational institutions should prepare personnel and students on how to react and respond during active shooter situations. This paper simulates an active shooter situation in order to investigate the effect of different student decisions and law enforcement response times on the number of casualties during a school lockdown. Different scenarios are simulated using the “run, hide, fight” protocol for various response times and student reaction strategies. The student reaction strategies are based on a survey that students from the Muscogee & Russell County school district completed for a hypothetical event. The simulation results indicate that slower police response times and having students hiding in the classrooms without locking the doors can result in an increased number of casualties.

References

  1. Active Shooter: How to Respond Poster. (2019). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Available at: https://www.dhs.gov/publication/active-shooterposter [Accessed 13 Oct. 2019]
  2. Adelman, S. A. (2016). Run, Hide Fight. TD&T: Theatre Design & Technology, 52(4), 30–41.
  3. Ahmed, S., Mehmood, S., & Kristensen, A. S. (2019, January). Critical Analysis of Computer-based Evacuation Simulation of an Educational Institution. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference On Computer Modeling and Simulation (pp. 26-30).
  4. Department of Education, Washington, DC. (2004). Practical information on crisis planning: A
    guide for schools and communities. ERIC Clearinghouse.
  5. Federal Bureau of Investigation, (2018), “Active Shooter Incidents in the United States from 2000 - 2018. Available from FBI 2018: https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/activeshooter-incidents-2000-2018.pdf/view. [Accessed on April 14, 2020].
  6. Law, A and McComas, M. (1990). Secrets of successful simulation studies. Industrial Engineering, 22(5), 47-72.
  7. Madireddy, M., Medeiros, D. J., & Kumara, S. (2011, December). An agent based model for evacuation traffic management. In Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) (pp. 222-233). IEEE.
  8. Manger, Thomas. (2013). Introduction. Critical Issues in Policing Series: The Police Response to Active Shooter Incidents, Police Executive Research Forum (PERF), Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, D.C.
  9. McCormack, P., & Chen, T. Y. (2014, April). Optimizing leader proportion and behavior for evacuating buildings. In Proceedings of the 2014 Symposium on Agent Directed Simulation (pp. 1-6).
  10. Mykoniatis, K. (2015). A Generic Framework For Multi-Method Modeling and Simulation of
    Complex Systems Using Discrete Event, System Dynamics and Agent Based Approaches.
  11. Mykoniatis, K., & Angelopoulou, A. (2020). A modeling framework for the application of multi-paradigm simulation methods. SIMULATION, 96(1), 55-73. 
  12. Glover, A. (2016). Active shooter: Preparing for the unthinkable. TD&T: Theatre Design &
    Technology, 52(4), 18-29. 
  13. Hofinger, G., Zinke, R., & Künzer, L. (2014). Human factors in evacuation simulation, planning, and guidance. Transportation Research Procedia, 2, 603-611.
  14. Improving School Safety with Enhance Drills. (2017). White Paper, pp.3-13.
  15. National Association of School Psychologists. (2018). Mitigating negative psychological effects of school lockdowns: Brief guidance for schools. pp.1-3.
  16. Rinaldi, R. P. (2016). Assessing Educators’ School Safety and Security Preparedness at a New Jersey K-12 Nonpublic School.
  17. Sisson, P. (2019). Mass shootings, school design, and the architecture of resignation. [online] Curbed. Available at: https://www.curbed.com/2019/9/6/20853191/mass-shooting-school-gun-control-architecture [Accessed 1 Oct. 2019].
  18. Spicer, B. (2018). The role of unarmed security in active killer defence. Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, 12(1), 40–55.
  19. Stewart, A. (2017). Active shooter simulations: An agent-based model of civilian response strategy. 
  20. Zhe, E. J., & Nickerson, A. B. (2007). Effects of an Intruder Crisis Drill on Children’s Knowledge,
    Anxiety, and Perceptions of School Safety. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 501–508.
  21. Zia, K., & Ferscha, A. (2009, October). A simulation study of exit choice based on effective throughput of an exit area in a multi-exit evacuation situation. In 2009 13th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications (pp. 235-238). IEEE.