1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2020
  4. HMS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.005

Simulation improves amusement park customer service

  • a Edward J. Williams 
  • a University of Michigan – Dearborn, 19000 Hubbard Drive, Dearborn, Michigan 48126 USA
Cite as
Williams E.J. (2020). Simulation improves amusement park customer service. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistic Modeling & Simulation(HMS 2020), pp. 31-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2020.hms.005

Abstract

Over the last half-century or more, simulation has established a splendid record of helping to improve complex systems. This fine record began historically with improvements to manufacturing processes, and in due course expanded to many other fields, including warehousing, transportation systems, health-care systems such as clinics and hospitals, and general customer-service systems such as banks, hotels, retail stores, and other venues where customer service is highly important. In this work, the application of simulation to improvement of customer service at an amusement park in Southeast Asia is documented, along with the contributions it made and indications for further work. The management of the park was justifiably concerned with operating costs, long customer waiting lines, and loss of potential customers via balking. Simulation pointed the way to significant process improvements and hence customer-service improvements with negligible increases in operating costs.

References

  1. Abu-Taieh, E. and El Sheikh, A. 2009. Commercial simulation packages: A comparative study.
    International Journal of Simulation Modelling (8,2), 66-76, June.
  2. Benneyan, C., 1998. Distribution fitting software makes simulation more attractive, viable in many applications. OR/MS Today (98:38,1-10).
  3. Heher, Y. and Chen, Y. 2017. Process mapping: A cornerstone of process improvement. Cancer
    Cytopathology (887-890), December. 
  4. Henly, J. and Lambert, S. 2014. Unpredictable work timing in retail jobs: Implications for employee work-life outcomes. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, (67,3), 986–1016, July.
  5. Jahangirian, M., Eldabi, T., Naseer, A., Stergioulas, L., and Young, T. 2010. Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review. European Journal of Operational Research (203, 1-13).
  6. Nirenberg, S., Daw, A., and Pender, J. 2018. The impact of queue length rounding and delayed app information on Disney World queues. Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, 3849-3860. December 9-12, Göteborg, Sweden.
  7. Prasad, B. and Strand, N. 1993. A flowchart-based methodology for process improvement.
    Proceedings of the Quality Concepts ’93 World Class Manufacturing Conference, 53-73. October 4-6, Warren, Michigan (United States of America).
  8. Prochaska, K. and Thiesing, R., 2017. Introduction to Simio. Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, 4410-4419. December 3-6, Las Vegas, Nevada (United States of America).
  9. Smith, J., Sturrock, D., and Kelton, W., 2018. Simio and simulation: Modeling, analysis, applications. 5th ed. Sewickley, Pennsylvania (United States of America): Simio LLC.
  10. Sturrock, D. 2018., Avoid failures! Tested success tips for simulation product excellence. Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, 252-260. December 2018, Göteborg (Sweden).
  11. Vasudevan, K., Lote, R., Williams, E., and Ülgen, O. 2009. High speedbottle manufacturing lines: Case studies and simulation software selection techniques. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter
    Simulation Conference, 322-332. December 2009, Austin, Texas (United States of America).
  12. Venkat, K. and Wakeland, W. 2006. Using simulation to understand and optimize a lean service process. Proceedings of the 2006 Spring Simulation Multiconference, 243-248. April 2006, Huntsville, Alabama (United States of America).Heard, N. A., Holmes, C. C., and Stephens, D. A. (2006). A quantitative study of gene regulation involved in the immune response of Anopheline mosquitoes: An application of Bayesian hierarchical clustering of curves. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 101:18–29.