1. Proceedings
  2. I3M
  3. 2020
  4. MAS
  5. 10.46354/i3m.2020.mas.022

Will Artificial Intelligences will be our judges and arbiters in the future and what role it will be taken by simulators

  • a Agostino G. Bruzzone , 
  • b Paolo Gaggero 
  • a Simulation Team, Università degli Studi di Genova, via Opera Pia 15, 16145, Genova, Italy
  • b Università degli Studi di Roma, La Sapienza, Piazzale A.Moro 5, 00185, Roma, Italy
Cite as
(a)Bruzzone A.G., (b)Gaggero P. (2020). Will Artificial Intelligences will be our judges and arbiters in the future and what role it will be taken by simulators. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2020), pp. 166-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2020.mas.022

Abstract

This paper proposes an overview on the potential use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) and M&S (Modeling and Simulation) to develop innovative solutions in a new emerging sector defined Legal Analytics. The analysis of previous and existing achievements respect to actual potential advances with special attention to new integrated solutions for Arbitration.

References

  1. Ansari, M. E., & Joloudar, S. Y. E. (2011). An investigation of TV advertisement effects on customers' purchasing and their satisfaction. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 3(4), 175.
  2. Ashley, K. D. (1991) "Modeling Legal Arguments: Reasoning with cases and hypotheticals", MIT press, Cambridge, MA
  3. Ashley, K. D. (2017) "Artificial Intelligence and legal analytics: new tools for Law Practice in the Digital Age", Cambridge University Press, UK
  4. Asaro C (2012) Ingegneria della conoscenza giuridica applicata al diritto penale. Aracne, Rome
  5. Bruzzone, A. G., Massei, M., Tarone, F., & Madeo, F. (2011) “Integrating intelligent agents & AHP in a complex system simulation”, Proc. of the International Symposium on the AHP, Sorrento, Italy, June
  6. Bruzzone, A. G. (2018). MS2G as Pillar for Developing Strategic Engineering as a New Discipline for Complex Problem Solving. Keynote Speech at I3 M, Budapest.
  7. Buchanan, B. G., & Headrick, T. E. (1970) "Some speculation about Artificial Intelligence and Legal reasoning", Stanford Law Review, n.23, pp.40-62
  8. Chen, P., & Wang, J. (2009) “Application of a fuzzy AHP method to risk assessment of international construction projects”, Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Business Intelligence, Beijing, China, June 6-7, pp. 459-462
  9. Governatori, G., Idelberger, F., Milosevic, Z., Riveret, R., Sartor, G., & Xu, X. (2018) "On Legal Contracts, imperative and declarative smart contracts, and blockchain systems", Artificial Intelligence and Law, n.26(4), pp.377-409
  10. Matlack C. (2016) "Robots Are Taking Divorce Lawyers’ Jobs, Too", Bloomberg Businessweek, June 30, 1400CEST
  11. Nissan, E. (2017) "Digital Technologies and Artificial Intelligence’s present and foreseeable impact on Lawyering, Judging, Policing and Law Enforcement", AI & Society, n.32(3), pp.441-464
  12. Re R.M. & Alicia Solow-Niederman (2019) "Developing Artificially Intelligent Justice", Stanford Technology Law Review, n.22, pp.242-249
  13. Susskind, R. E. (1986) "Expert Systems in Law: A jurisprudential approach to artificial intelligence and Legal Reasoning", The modern law review, n.49(2), pp.168-194