Analytical Method to Determine the Test Positions for Validation of a Two-Dimensional Shuttle System Model

  • Giulia Siciliano 
  • Christian U. Schuster,
  • c  Johannes Fottner
  • a,c Chair of Materials Handling, Material Flow, Logistics, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, Garching bei München 85748, Germany
  • b  Department of Physics, Technical University of Munich, James-Franck-Straße 1, Garching bei München 85748, Germany
Cite as
Siciliano G., Schuster C.U., Fottner J. (2021). Analytical Method to Determine the Test Positions for Validation of a Two-Dimensional Shuttle System Model. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Modeling & Applied Simulation (MAS 2021), pp. 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2021.mas.003

Abstract

Test positions are necessary to efficiently validate that the simulation and physical implementation of a warehouse are in agreement. Test positions denote the retrieval and storage positions that give values representative for the average performance. In this paper, we develop an analytical method to determine these test positions for the shuttle base tier of a highly-dynamic, hybrid pallet storage and retrieval system or dynamic hybrid pallet warehouse (DHPW). The analytical method developed is also valid for any other shuttle system, regardless of the layout or the load carriers. Moreover, the analytical method developed does not require the hypothesis of uniform filling of the warehouse. In this paper, first, we briefly describe the system under consideration. Next, we review the relevant existing methods to determine test positions for shuttle-based warehouses. Afterwards, we develop our concept for the analytical method to determine the test positions. In conclusion, we verify the concept developed through discrete event simulation experiments. 

References

  1. Eder, J., Klopfenstein, T., and Gebhardt, M. (2019). Lagersystem zur Speicherung und Abgabe von Ladungsträgern. Patent DE102019211804, German Patent and Trade Mark Office (DPMA).
  2. FEM, European Materials Handling Federation (2003). Performance record for storage and retrieval machines – Cycle times. FEM, 9.851.
  3. FEM, European Materials Handling Federation (2017). Guideline Cycle time calculation for automated vehicle storage and retrieval systems. FEM, 9.860.
  4. Heragu , S.S., Cai, C., Krishnamurthy, A, and Malmborg, C. J. (2011). Analytical models for analysis of automated warehouse material handling systems. International Journal of Production Research, 49 (22): 6833–61.
  5. Lienert, T., and Fottner, J. (2017 (b)). Development of a generic simulation method for the time window routing of automated guided vehicles. Logistics Journal: Proceedings, Vol. 2017.
  6. Lienert, T., Wenzler, F., and Fottner, J. (2020). Simulation-based evaluation of reservation mechanisms for the time window routing method. 33st European Conference on Modelling and Simulation (ECMS): Proceedings, 34(1): 301-307.
  7. Siciliano, G., Lienert, and T., Fottner, J. (2020). Design, Simulation and Performance of a Highly-Dynamic, Hybrid Pallet Storage and Retrieval System. 19th International Conference on Modeling and Applied Simulation: Proceedings, 68-75.
  8. VDI, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1998). Throughput of Automatic Warehouses with Lane-bound Shelf Operating Systems; Throughput of automatic warehouses with non-lane-bound shelf operating system; Throughput of automatic warehouses with multiple-depth storage. VDI,4480.