How sustainability factors influence maintenance of water distribution systems feeding manufacturing industries

  • Silvia Carpitella 
  • bAntonella Certa
  • Giulia Marcon
  • a,Department of Decision-Making Theory, Institute of Information Theory and Automation, Czech Academy of Sciences, Pod Vodárenskou Věží 4, 18208, Prague, Czech Republic
  • b,c Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128, Palermo, Italy
Cite as
Carpitella S., Certa A., and Marcon G. (2022).,How sustainability factors influence maintenance of water distribution systems feeding manufacturing industries. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Simulation for Energy, Sustainable Development & Environment (SESDE 2022). , 007 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.46354/i3m.2022.sesde.007

Abstract

This work aims to analyse the role played by relevant sustainability factors towards the implementation of maintenance interventions in the manufacturing industrial sector. In this context, we focus on industrial water distribution systems, on whose effective work depends the functioning of core plants as well as general industrial facilities. In detail, we propose a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) application based on the use of the Analytic Network Process (ANP) as a methodological way to prioritise maintenance interventions while considering the influence of some of the most relevant sustainability factors identified in literature. The main advantage of such an approach consists in the elaboration of a flexible maintenance procedure for companies based on a well-known and reliable multi-criteria application. The novelty of our work refers to the development of a structured link between sustainability factors and maintenance management of industrial water distribution systems, something that is fundamental in manufacturing but also in other fields of application.

References

  1. Abdi, A. and Taghipour, S. (2019). Sustainable asset management: A repair-replacement decision model considering environmental impacts, maintenance quality, and risk. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136:117–134.
  2. Ahmed, U., Carpitella, S., and Certa, A. (2021). An integrated methodological approach for optimising complex systems subjected to predictive maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216:108022.
  3. Benítez, J., Carpitella, S., Certa, A., and Izquierdo, J. (2019). Management of uncertain pairwise comparisons in AHP through probabilistic concepts. Applied Soft Computing, 78:274–285.
  4. Carpitella, S., Carpitella, F., Certa, A., Benítez, J., and Izquierdo, J. (2018). Managing human factors to reduce organisational risk in industry. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 23(4):67
  5. Carpitella, S. and Izquierdo, J. (2022). Preference-based assessment of organisational risk in complex environments. In International Symposium on Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making, pages 40–52. Springer
  6. Carpitella, S., Mzougui, I., Benítez, J., Carpitella, F., Certa, A., Izquierdo, J., and La Cascia, M. (2021). A risk evaluation framework for the best maintenance strategy: The case of a marine salt manufacture firm. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 205:107265
  7. Franciosi, C., Di Pasquale, V., Iannone, R., and Miranda, S. (2020). Multi-stakeholder perspectives on indicators for sustainable maintenance performance in production contexts: an exploratory study. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering.
  8. Gupta, G. and Mishra, R. (2018). Identification of critical components using ANP for implementation of reliability centered maintenance. Procedia CIRP, 69:905–909.
  9. Li, T., Li, A., and Guo, X. (2020). The sustainable development-oriented development and utilization of renewable energy industry – a comprehensive analysis of MCDM methods. Energy, 212:118694
  10. Liu, Z., Balieu, R., and Kringos, N. (2022). Integrating sustainability into pavement maintenance effectiveness evaluation: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 104:103187
  11. Olugu, E. U., Mammedov, Y. D., Young, J. C. E., and Yeap, P. S. (2021). Integrating spherical fuzzy delphi and TOPSIS technique to identify indicators for sustainable maintenance management in the Oil and Gas industry. Journal
    of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences.
  12. Qin, W., Zhuang, Z., Liu, Y., and Xu, J. (2022). Sustainable service oriented equipment maintenance management
    of steel enterprises using a two-stage optimization approach. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 75:102311
  13. Ranjbari, M., Esfandabadi, Z. S., Zanetti, M. C., Scagnelli, S. D., Siebers, P.-O., Aghbashlo, M., Peng, W., Quatraro,F., and Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review
    and future research agenda for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297:126660
  14. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology,
    15(3):234–281.
  15. Saaty, T. L. (2004). Fundamentals of the analytic network process—Dependence and feedback in decisionmaking with a single network. Journal of Systems science and Systems engineering, 13(2):129–157.
  16. Sari, E., Ma’aram, A., Shaharoun, A. M., Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., Klemeš, J. J., Marie, I. A., and Saraswati, D. (2021). Measuring sustainable cleaner maintenance hierarchical contributions of the car manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312:127717.
  17. Sénéchal, O. (2016). Maintenance decision support for sustainable performance: problems and research directions at the crossroads of health management and  eco-design. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(28):85–90
  18. Singh, P., Singh, S., Vardhan, S., and Patnaik, A. (2020). Sustainability of maintenance management practices in hydropower plant: a conceptual framework. Materials Today: Proceedings, 28:1569–1574.
  19. Suresh, M. and Dharunanand, R. (2021). Factors influencing sustainable maintenance in manufacturing industries. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering.
  20. Van Horenbeek, A. and Pintelon, L. (2014). Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega, 42(1):33–46.
  21. Vrignat, P., Kratz, F., and Avila, M. (2022). Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218:108140
  22. Vrignat, P., Kratz, F., and Avila, M. (2022). Sustainable manufacturing, maintenance policies, prognostics and health management: A literature review. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 218:108140
  23. Xu, G. and Guo, F. (2022). Sustainability-oriented maintenance management of highway bridge networks based
    on Q-learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81:103855.